
|
|
|
|---|
|
Talks
|
|
 NCFS,
 Orlando
 2 Nov
 2006
|
F2CCamp
 Austin
 26 September
 2006
|
IEEE
 Net Neutrality
 Austin
 21 September
 2006
|
Armadillocon,
 Austin
 12 August
 2006
|
Metricon,
 Vancouver
 1 Aug
 2006
|
Agora,
 Seattle
 16 June
 2006
|
RSNZ,
 Wellington
 17 Nov
 2005
|
TRISC,
 Austin
 20 Sep
 2005
|
APWG,
 London
 19 April
 2005
|
RSA
 San Francisco
 17 Feb
 2005
|
InnoTech
 Austin
 3 Nov
 2004
|
LinuCon
 Austin
 9 Oct
 2004
|
Internet2
 Austin
 29 Sep
 2004
|
Supernova
 Santa Clara
 24 June
 2004
|
 SXSW
 Austin
 15 March
 2004
|
CACTUS
 Austin
 18 Sep
 2003
|
TPRC
 Arlington,
 VA
 19-21 Sept
 2003
|
AIP
 Austin
 18 June
 2003
|
EFF
 Austin
 15 April
 2003
|
NGN,
 Boston,
 14-18
 Oct
 2002
|
MIT
 Wireless
 Forum,
 NYC,
 15 Oct
 2002
|
TPRC,
 VA,
 28-30
 Sep
 2002
|
DCSB,
 Boston,
 4 June
 2002
|
|
|
|
|
Decentralized Risk
Slides
Abstract
Decentralization is one of the main strengths of the Internet,
permitting distributed ownership and operations.
Yet decentralization combined with automation breeds epidemic risk:
-
$200M in fraud and theft losses in 2002 (CSI/FBI)
-
$10B in worm and virus-related losses (Goldman-Sachs)
-
$100B cyberhurricane risk per Fortune 500 company (mi2g)
Enterprises cannot directly control decentralized risk outside their firewall.
Enterprises need such risk quantified so they can manage it, but
they can't quantify it themselves. Quantification is needed of
the underlying perils (hazards such as nonredundant links, periodic
congestion, etc.) and anomalies (worms, viruses, cable cuts, etc.).
A big picture view with sufficient detail may be able to see problems
before they turn into crises.
Two other applicable risk management mechanisms are insurance policies
and performance bonds. They are similar to California catastrophe bonds,
utility bonds, and stock futures. Liability for software bugs may be
an enabler.
Last changed: $Date: 2004/06/28 19:27:18 $
|